17 U.S. Code § 107 - Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use
Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include—
(1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes [all mirrored content falls under this clause, any ads present are mirrored from the original site, mirrored content earns me no revenue whatsoever];
(2) the nature of the copyrighted work [this is a unique resource for the mentally ill, and preservation of it can be argued to be incredibly important];
(3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
(4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. [none, as the original work no longer exists outside of archive.org and this website - update: the original site is intermittantly completely unavailable and has a SSL certificate that expired months ago, so this still holds as most users will be unable to access it easily if at all (and now as of May 2018 the original site is completely offline and no longer even has any A records in its DNS)]
The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.

This domain is not controlled by Jerod Poore, and I will NOT continue redirecting traffic from this domain to crazymeds.us [as I formerly did] while Jerod continues with his immature temper tantrum over adblock or continues to fail to maintain his site, fucking over his entire community and countless visitors in the process.
This mirror is unfortunately incomplete (and very slightly outdated), as /CrazyTalk/ was not included when I scraped the site (it was far too large to scrape given the site's extremely poor performance, my wish to avoid worsening the poor performance further, and other factors). If you're looking for a replacement forum, I suggest visiting https://www.crazyboards.org/forums/. There are issues with many of the mirrored pages, I am working on identifying and fixing them, but I do not have the time to address every single issue at this moment (although by now the majority of these issues have been resolved). Dynamic content is obviously completely broken (this is beyond my control), and the loss of /CrazyTalk/ is quite bad given how much good user-generated info was on there, but you have Jerod to "thank" for that. Maybe I'll bring it back online at some point, but it wouldn't be the same as before. For now, I suggest visiting CrazyBoards instead.
Note (Oct 9 2018): Additional updates regarding the status of this site will be posted on https://info.crazymeds.net

as treatments for depression, anxiety & more

SSRIs - The World’s Most Popular Antidepressants

These are the serotonin-selective (or serotonin-specific)1 reuptake inhibitors approved in the US that we have articles on. I’ve included some of the more popular trade names used in other countries.

Brief history of SSRIs

The original SSRI, zimelidine, made its debut in March 1972. It was developed by Drs. Arvid Carlsson and Hans Corrodi, and is based upon the antihistamines brompheniramine (Dimetapp), chlorpheniramine (Chlor-Trimeton), and diphenhydramine (Benadryl).

Soon other SSRIs were under development. Lundbeck’s citalopram was being developed at about the same time, although it wasn’t approved until 1989. DU 23000 - the designation used prior to the assignment of the generic name fluvoxamine - was being tested for depression as far back as 1977. Solvay released fluvoxamine as Fevarin in Switzerland in 1984, although it wasn’t approved in the US until 1993. According to Wikipedia Upstene (indalpine) was marketed in France from 1982 to 1987. The story about why it was pulled and other details are different than what is in David Healy’s Let Them Eat Prozac, but at least that book confirms Upstene’s existence in France in the 1980s. Indalpine may still be available somewhere.2 Eli Lilly’s Prozac (fluoxetine) received approval from the US FDA in 1987 and the rest quickly followed.

Pages and Forum Topics Google Thinks are Related to This One

Classifications of Antidepressants | Antidepressant Topic Index | NSRIs
SSRIs All on One Page | SSRIs Page & SNRIs 2

Keep Crazymeds on the air.
Donate some spare electronic currency
you have floating around The Cloud

1 We prefer Dr. Preskorn's serotonin-selective reuptake inhibitor (as well as norepinephrine-selective and whatever_monoamine-selective) because:
1) It's grammatically correct. "Selective serotonin" is a clumsy way to describe how reuptake inhibitor is supposed work on a single neurotransmitter. Even if most of them fail at being all that selective.
2) It allows for unambiguous initialisms / acronyms. SNRI means Serotonin-Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitor and NSRI means Norepinephrine-Selective Reuptake Inhibitor. Otherwise SNRI could mean either Serotonin-Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitor or Selective Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitor.

2 Several China-based pharmaceutical manufacturers offer Indalpine for sale. E.g. Beijing JHYB Pharm. Tech. http://www.jhyb.com.cn/hc_en/C0515.htm

Serotonin-Selective Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI) and Serotonin & Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitor (SNRI) Antidepressants by Jerod Poore is copyright © 2010 Jerod Poore

Last modified on Monday, 27 July, 2015 at 10:00:20 by JerodPoorePage Author: Jerod PooreDate created: 26 November 2010

All drug names are the trademarks of someone else. Look on the appropriate PI sheets or ask Google who the owners are. The way pharmaceutical companies buy each other and swap products like Monopoly™ real estate, the ownership of any trademarks may have changed without my noticing.

Page design and explanatory material by Jerod Poore, copyright © 2003 - 2015. All rights reserved. See the full copyright notice for full copyright details.
Don’t automatically believe everything you read on teh Intergoogles. No warranty is expressed or implied in this information. Consult one or more doctors and/or pharmacists before taking, or changing how you take any neurological and/or psychiatric medication. Your mileage may vary. What happened to us won’t necessarily happen to you. For more details see the Crazymeds big-ass disclaimer.

Enable Crazymeds’ Financial Solvency!

Enable Crazymeds to keep spreading our knowledge. Donate some spare e-currency you have floating around The Cloud.

Improve Your Social Media Skills


Follow our Highly Irregular Updates and Paranoid Rants Other News

Square this Circle

For Site News and NeuroPsych Research


Show us teh like™

Crazymeds: The Blog

For Site News and Crap that Distracts me from my Fucked-up Life

Crazymeds’ Tumblr

Mentally Interesting Advocacy

OpEd News

Daily Kos

Sites That Probably Suck Less Than Crazymeds

Crazymeds Merchandise

Available at Straitjacket T-Shirts

Vaccines Cause Immunity bumpersticker at Straitjacket T-Shirts

Stuck Up
All stickers $5. Now Available in Packs of 10 & 50

Mentally Interesting button at Straitjacket T-Shirts

Button It!
2.25″ $4 & 3.5″ $4.50. Now Available in Packs of 10 & 100